Charger Logistics signs on for up to 500 Aurora driverless trucks — a nonbinding MOU bigger than its entire U.S. fleet today
A nonbinding memorandum signed Monday would have Charger Logistics buy up to 500 Aurora Driver-powered trucks over 2027 and 2028 and pay Aurora $0.85 or more a mile to drive them, under the same carrier-owned Driver-as-a-Service model as this week's 75-truck Kodiak deal — at nearly seven times the scale, and with no binding order yet behind it.
Summarized from FreightWaves.
Image: Illustration: AI-generated by CDLWire
Aurora Innovation signed a nonbinding memorandum of understanding Monday under which Charger Logistics intends to buy up to 500 Aurora Driver-powered trucks, with deliveries over 2027 and 2028, according to FreightWaves on Oct. 28. The deal builds on a contract Charger signed in July to start driverless hauls between Dallas and Laredo, Texas. Under a final agreement, Charger would own the trucks and pay Aurora for the driving through its Driver as a Service model. Carrier-owned fleets are central to Aurora's plan to run more than 30,000 driverless trucks by 2030. The word to keep hold of in every sentence of this announcement is 'nonbinding': this is a statement of intent to negotiate a purchase, not an order, and the distinction is where this story differs most from the definitive 75-truck Kodiak agreement CDLWire reported in Wednesday's edition.
Charger's president tied the larger intent to its first months running autonomous trucks on the border lane. 'Since launching autonomous operations along the Laredo corridor, we've realized immediate operational benefits that point to a clear path to scaling,' said Andy Khera, president of Charger Logistics. 'Aurora's plans to open long-haul, high-volume routes position us to scale geographically while we integrate autonomy from our TMS to the road, building a resilient and autonomous ecosystem for our customers.' Aurora made the ownership case in its release: 'Owning the physical asset is the logical choice for our customers: it makes today's operations more efficient and enables carriers to grow their business, keeping them competitive,' said Zac Andreoni, vice president of business development at Aurora. Charger plans to run the Aurora trucks on current and new high-volume routes near the border and across the country, and Andreoni added: 'With the launch of our second-generation hardware and trucks, Aurora is ready to support our customers' ambitions to grow their networks and move more freight with driverless trucks.'
The economics FreightWaves drew from Aurora's third-quarter shareholder letter explain why the ownership question matters. Charger's July agreement is a Transport as a Service deal, according to the letter: under that model, Aurora owns and operates the trucks and charges about $2 per mile, including a fuel surcharge. Under Driver as a Service, the carrier buys the truck and pays Aurora for the driving — $0.85 or more per mile, on trucks Aurora expects to run about 250,000 miles a year. The letter calls the Charger deal 'a potential multi-year revenue stream in the hundreds of millions of dollars.' Neither company disclosed Charger's per-mile rate. The structure is the same one Kodiak and DTL Transport announced this week — the carrier owns the iron, the autonomy company sells the driving by the mile.
The scale, against Charger's actual fleet, is the other number to sit with. Charger Logistics, a privately held, asset-based carrier, operates across the U.S. and Mexico, moving goods for the food and beverage, pharmaceutical, automotive and retail industries. Its U.S. unit, Charger Logistics USA, lists 481 power units and 542 drivers in its Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration registration, last updated in October 2025. The 500 Aurora trucks would exceed that count. FreightWaves' summary of why it matters is exact: the deal would move the cost of owning driverless trucks from Aurora to the carrier, and if the deal completes and the MOU is fulfilled, Charger would take on more trucks than its U.S. unit runs today. That is a fleet-transformation commitment on paper — which is precisely why the nonbinding status, and the delivery window two to three years out, deserve equal weight with the headline number.
The cautionary language is not boilerplate to skip. The cautionary statement in Aurora's release lists the risk that the Charger MOU may not lead to a final agreement and binding orders 'on the anticipated timeframe or at all.' In September, Aurora pushed back its own target for breakeven gross margin on a run-rate basis to the first half of 2027, at about 500 trucks, from the end of 2026. And the cost question is being asked by Aurora's own customers in public: Werner Enterprises, another Aurora customer, was still negotiating economic terms in September, and Daragh Mahon, Werner's executive vice president and chief information officer, addressed the cost on a customer panel at Aurora's Analyst and Investor Day in Dallas on Sept. 23. 'And I will be quite honest that we have a gap. We've got to figure this out,' Mahon said.
The practical takeaway for drivers is to price this announcement at what it legally is. No Charger driver loses a lane to this MOU this year, or next: deliveries, if a final agreement is signed at all, run over 2027 and 2028, on high-volume border and national routes, in trucks Charger does not yet own, under a per-mile driving fee neither company has disclosed. What is real today is narrower and still significant — a midsize cross-border carrier that has run the Laredo corridor driverlessly since July says the operation works well enough to intend a fleet-scale purchase, and the business model behind both this week's autonomy deals puts the truck, and its costs, on the carrier. Watch for the two confirmations that would turn intent into capacity: a final, binding agreement, and the first delivered trucks. Until both exist, the 500 is a negotiating position with a press release, not a fleet.


Comments
Loading comments…